Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:48:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: RJ45 <rj45@slacknet.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FFS or reiserfs ? Message-ID: <44CBAD76.9050503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607291231130.29069@slacknet.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607291231130.29069@slacknet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RJ45 wrote: > > Hello, > I do not know if it is better to use reiserfs or the standard rReeBSD > filesystem with soft updates enabled for a cyrus spool and db partition. > Users have a lot of files on those partition. > Anyone can suggest me if it is better to use reiserfs or FFS ? > I am using FreeBSD 6.1 > > thanks > > Rick > > Reiserfs is read only, so you can only use FFS yet. -- Cheers, Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44CBAD76.9050503>