From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jan 16 14:17:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA01093
          for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:17:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.win.net (ns1.win.net [204.215.209.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01077
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:16:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jfmays@launchpad.win.net)
Received: from launchpad.win.net (notebook01.win.net [204.215.209.215]) by ns1.win.net (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA07957; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 16:38:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <34BFD329.B17136C2@launchpad.win.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 16:37:45 -0500
From: Joe Mays <jfmays@launchpad.win.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lists <lists@mrvid.demon.co.uk>
CC: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Distributed Webservers
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980115173926.5384F-100000@millennium.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Lists wrote:
> 
> I don't understand why a customer would need NT unless they needed
> Frontpage extensions, which 1. are crap and 2. are available on
> UN*X anyway!
> 
> Any other reasons?

ASP.  Access database integration.  MSSQL integration.  I
personally have no desire for NT, but these are the reasons
are customers want to be able to run things off of NT, often
in conjunction with a site under BSD, and I have no desire
to tell them to get lost just because I don't care for NT
myself.