From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 3 12:15:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E960816A4CE for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:15:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E6643D39 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493606520E for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:15:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 71617-03-2 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:15:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87467651FC for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:15:05 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BD477615E; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:15:04 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 13:15:04 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040703121504.GR97102@empiric.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tBhgiDt8dP1efIIJ" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: if_fwe -> BURN_BRIDGES? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 12:15:08 -0000 --tBhgiDt8dP1efIIJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, Now that we have dfr's IP-over-1394 code in the tree, I suggest we consider depracating if_fwe(4) as it's nonstandard anyway. What does everyone else think? Regards, BMS --tBhgiDt8dP1efIIJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFA5qNHueUpAYYNtTsRAhwYAJ4oUJ9YBItO+mZorjOI3vZHZHpKFgCghdwP /XoU5SvRtMw30izXxlAeNzA= =Wxc7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tBhgiDt8dP1efIIJ--