Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:05:04 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcsh - Imported sources Message-ID: <200004152205.QAA29099@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "15 Apr 2000 15:00:02 PDT." <vqc7ldz9g9p.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <vqc7ldz9g9p.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <1210.955826595@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004152113.PAA28692@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <vqc7ldz9g9p.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami writes: : I wouldn't say "people generally" argued against" it. Peter Wemm, : myself and a lot of other committers supported it, saying that tcsh is : just a newer and maintained version of our old csh. Agreed. Those that argued against it sited size. : I do remember people setting up strawman arguments about embedded : systems just to be knocked down by the embedded folks themselves. :> Well, I am an embedded folk and argued for the change. However, my boss argued against, so that more than cancels me out :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004152205.QAA29099>