From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:21:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4306016A405 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from mail08b.verio.de (mail08b.verio.de [213.198.55.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AC9343D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:21:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from mx06.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.35) by mail08b.verio.de (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 1-0764653261; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:21:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.jennejohn.org [213.198.5.174] (EHLO peedub.jennejohn.org) by mx06.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id d36bf544.16189.372.mx06.stngva01.us.mxservers.net; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:21:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.13.4/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k48LKxSi006193; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:20:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200605082120.k48LKxSi006193@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Sideris Michael In-Reply-To: Message from Sideris Michael of "Mon, 08 May 2006 23:57:03 +0300." <20060508205703.GA11215@daemons.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:20:59 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn X-Spam: [F=0.0329376119; heur=0.500(-19800); stat=0.032; spamtraq-heur=0.500(2006050808)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [213.198.5.174] X-Loop-Detect: 1 X-DistLoop-Detect: 1 Cc: Pav Lucistnik , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports structure and improvement suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:21:06 -0000 Sideris Michael writes: > > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:47:51PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > No one is taking away any rights. > > Of course. That's why every ports should have a configuration panel. > Wrong. I do not intend to convert any of my ports to use OPTIONS so don't bother sending me patches. Many ports are so simple that adding a configuration panel would be totally unnnecessary and ridiculous. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTde