From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 01:47:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E6116A4CE; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:47:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.webcraft99.com (prwire.bernama.com [202.188.124.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F3043D2D; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:46:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from afu-subscribed-list@aeefyu.net) Received: from localhost (beta.webcraft99.com [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.webcraft99.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB5719308; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:53 +0800 (MYT) Received: from mailhub.webcraft99.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beta.webcraft99.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16147-06; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:44 +0800 (MYT) Received: from aeefyu.net (unknown [202.157.203.86]) by mailhub.webcraft99.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5495D19307; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:41 +0800 (MYT) Message-ID: <4062AA80.9020104@aeefyu.net> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:40 +0800 From: Aeefyu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040320 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4060F9C0.5080102@aeefyu.net> <200403251905.04769.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200403251905.04769.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhub.webcraft99.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Probelms and Inconsistencies with Portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:47:05 -0000 anubis wrote: >> >>My problems surfaced when I updated Portupgrade with reference to >>item 20040226 in /usr/ports/UPDATING (though I suspect this is just >>a catalyst -- actual problem lies elsewhere) >> > > I had a similar problem. I saw another thread where they suggested > getting rid of your refuse file, cvsup the ports tree again then > portsdb -uU > Worked for me. No more errors. The cvsup refuse file would be manually generated *ignored ports directory, right? Unless cvsup (from ports) comes with a default refuse file, I dont have any. -- Feisal Webcraft Solutions - http://www.webcraftsolutions.com -------------------------------------- You know you've been spending too much time on the computer when your friend misdates a check, and you suggest adding a "++" to fix it.