From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 22 05:43:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA23046 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 05:43:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA23039 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 05:43:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA13688; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 05:41:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Paul Richards cc: "'John Birrell'" , dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, nrice@emu.sourcee.com, imp@village.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does building current on 2.2.x still work? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Jul 1998 10:43:36 BST." Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 05:41:58 -0700 Message-ID: <13683.901111318@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Would it make sense to install the new mk files during the bootstrap > target. The original idea I had for the bootstrap target was to deal > with precisely these things, carry out steps required to bootstrap from > the previously released version to current. Not really, since if the mk files have changed enough to cause the Makefile to not even parse properly (which is what happens in this case), how are you going to run the bootstrap target at all? :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message