From owner-freebsd-net Fri Dec 22 16:34: 7 2000 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 16:34:05 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.interware.hu (mail.interware.hu [195.70.32.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D42737B400 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 16:34:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from gaborone-56.budapest.interware.hu ([195.70.52.184] helo=elischer.org) by mail.interware.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 149cdO-0002L4-00; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 01:34:03 +0100 Sender: julian@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <3A43F2C4.45A4B77A@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 16:33:08 -0800 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Rusher Cc: John Smith , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: New netgraph features?] References: <20001222074211.20124.qmail@nw174.netaddress.usa.net> <3A43CC06.DD56C1BF@integratus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jack Rusher wrote: > > John Smith wrote: > > > > loose something, if we, say, create special node > > for 'netgraph tunneling' (so that it may ot may not > > I would like to see netgraph used to facilitate shared coherent > interface support for FreeBSD (very valuable for clustering). Does > anyone have an opinion on the difficulty of hacking something like this > into the tunnel node code? > can you describe it better? -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000 ---> X_.---._/ from Perth, presently in: Budapest v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message