From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 23 21:20:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4D816A41F for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFB143D68 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:20:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2NLKYMs073315; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:20:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id k2NLKYnM073314; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:20:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:20:34 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20060323132034.A73245@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20060323195534.GB25560@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <3AC2CAE7FC658D8EBA589F4F@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20060323124953.A72829@xorpc.icir.org> <20060323211838.GA1787@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060323211838.GA1787@odin.ac.hmc.edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:18:38PM -0800 Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lo0 not starting on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:20:42 -0000 On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:18:38PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: ... > It used to be hard coded. Today we force it to the front of the list > in the network_interfaces=auto case, but don't do anything special with > it in the other case. We could change to code to always make it the > first item in all cases if it exists at all, but I'm not particularly > thrilled by that idea. In general I don't recommend the use of > network_interfaces at all and I'm tempted to nuke it at some point in > the future. It's not really necessicary any more becuse you can use the > NOAUTO keyword in your ifconfig_ lines if you want them around, but > don't want them used at boot. the NOAUTO makes sense indeed. basically it is a documentation issue - print a warning when you parse rc.conf and find network_interfaces set, and suggest NOAUTO instead. cheers luigi