From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 02:40:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2715106566B for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F73F8FC12 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n562e2jP032035 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n562e2un032034; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:40:02 GMT Message-Id: <200906060240.n562e2un032034@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mike Meyer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/135300: update for ports/www/webcheck X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mike Meyer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/135300; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Meyer To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/135300: update for ports/www/webcheck Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:02:53 -0400 On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:30:12 UT Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of www/webcheck, > > Please note that PR ports/135300 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135300 The software - not website - has a new maintainer. Since this isn't a patch, but a complete port, the MAINTAINER should be changed to Jeremy (if he's willing) and then used as is. As the current maintainer, I have no objection to that. Jeremy - as a port maintainer, you should submit patches, not archives. That's what committers expect. http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org