From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 25 06:48:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DB016A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:48:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.libero.it (smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206E643D1D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:48:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ml.ventu@flashnet.it)
Received: from soth.ventu (151.37.23.42) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.020-DD01)
	id 401D5FAE00A07345 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org;
	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:49:14 +0100
Received: from mailer (xanatar.ventu [10.1.2.6])
	by soth.ventu (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with SMTP id i1PEmjmZ032110
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:48:45 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ml.ventu@flashnet.it)
Message-Id: <200402251448.i1PEmjmZ032110@soth.ventu>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:48:45 EST
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml.ventu@flashnet.it>
Subject: Re: Bad loopback traffic not stopped by ipfw.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:48:47 -0000

** Reply to note from Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:21:34 +0300


> P.S. This is really off-topic already. We should move to -isp@ may be.

I don't really think so, why would it be?
It's concerning ipfw, netstat, traffic and the IP stack in general, I believe.

N.B. I'm obviously willing to move if it is decided so.

 bye
        av.