Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:24 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? Message-ID: <201204101400.q3AE0OKq004332@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:32 -0000." <CADLo839aXhhAM-uf-eUvEaQpc7b=vTkJt3diLSMn9CY%2BWv5saQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <CADLo839aXhhAM-uf-eUvEaQpc7b=vTkJt3diLSMn9CY+Wv5saQ@mail.gmail.c om> , Chris Rees writes: > --0015174c427a04100904bd4d714b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote: > > > > In message <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin > writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > > > upstream since 2008. > > > > > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be > able t > > > o > > > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which > already have > > > a > > > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > > > > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. > > > > I see no reason to keep php4. > > > > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for > > now. > > The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. Then ports which break should be removed as well. One of my websites broke when I upgraded PHP from 5.3 to 5.5. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201204101400.q3AE0OKq004332>