From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Oct  3 14:05:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA12795
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 14:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA12693
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 14:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1)
	id 0xHEtH-0000sa-00; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 15:04:03 -0600
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.7/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA12733; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 15:03:48 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199710032103.PAA12733@harmony.village.org>
To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS 
Cc: mark@quickweb.com, stable@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Oct 1997 09:59:47 PDT."
		<199710031659.JAA05912@austin.polstra.com> 
References: <199710031659.JAA05912@austin.polstra.com>  <Pine.NEB.3.96.971002151201.6569A-100000@pooh.cdrom.com> <25507.875833224@time.cdrom.com> <19971002195822.55220@vinyl.quickweb.com> 
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 15:03:48 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199710031659.JAA05912@austin.polstra.com> John Polstra writes:
: Could it be that the problem is simply that people don't _read_ the
: documentation which already exists?

Actually, I think it all revolves around the definition of "revision"
personally.  I have read the docs, and have been around for years.  I
know what the definitions are.  I'm just saying that it would be more
useful to change them a little...

Jordan, when's the first day that you'll listen to new arguments on
this :-)

Warner