Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:13:41 -0500 From: "Simon Chang" <simonychang@gmail.com> To: "Martin McCormick" <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware Questions Message-ID: <8efc42630702220713w4bf0590fm112788415c1c8cab@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A rule of thumb is to configure as much service as you need (in this case, dhcpd), with as little overhead as you can get away with (a simple jail vs. a full-blown VM). SC On 2/22/07, Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote: > John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's, writes: > > For what you're talking about, jails make a lot more sense than > > virtualization or emulation. > > Thank you! That is exactly the kind of input I was > looking for. As soon as I read yours and Frank Staals' mention > of jails, it clicked. A true jail will have a little version of > as much of the FreeBSD world as dhcpd needs to run. This should > be much easier on resources and more predictable as to results. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8efc42630702220713w4bf0590fm112788415c1c8cab>