From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 1 7:26:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B83157B4; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:26:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA010781969; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 06:12:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 06:12:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Eivind Eklund Cc: Luigi Rizzo , Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , mladavac@metropolitan.at, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a two-level port system? (fwd) In-Reply-To: <19990601071242.A58405@bitbox.follo.net> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > There are a number of solutions available: > (1) Change 'make release' to scan the ports collection and create an > mtree file beforehand; apply the mtree file before extracting the > collection. This will make the inode layout more efficient. I think this is a very realistic, easy thing to do. Maybe I'll work on a patch.. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message