From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 19:53:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14530AC1; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumbbell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.made4.biz (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7018::1:3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE342E78; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 141.7.19.93.rev.sfr.net ([93.19.7.141] helo=[192.168.1.176]) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VGaBf-000O1k-OB; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 21:53:24 +0200 Message-ID: <5224ECB2.9070309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 21:53:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r255153 - in head/sys: dev/atkbdc sys References: <201309021915.r82JFKO1075757@svn.freebsd.org> <5224E5DE.2090301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "src-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 19:53:26 -0000 Le 02/09/2013 21:29, Adrian Chadd a écrit : > .. right, so you changed the structure layout without say, just adding > to the end of said structure? :-) Yes, I took the patch as-is from the PR, as I don't have the hardware to test it and didn't know this struct was public. And as it worked for several people... > Yeah, I think you need to send out something. The binary packages for > x11 need to be updated too or things will be odd. What's the correct procedure for such changes? After a quick search, xf86-input-synaptics is using it. I need to: o add a note to UPDATING, at least mentionning that xf86-input-synaptics must be rebuilt o send a mail to freebsd-x11@ to warn users o what about binary packages? o something else? I see now that the structure is documented in psm(4) too... -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron