From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 24 22:56:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE82B16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF4C243D2F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tomonage2@gmx.de)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2005 22:56:15 -0000
Received: from pD9569445.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.200])
	(217.86.148.69)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 23:56:15 +0100
X-Authenticated: #7843803
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:56:12 +0100
From: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage2@gmx.de>
To: FreeBSD-Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <BE1B3B9C.16A70%tomonage2@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050115151925.795e9f4f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: Re:Can somebody close ports/73203?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:19 -0000

> I submitted this back in October and it's been sitting there since then.
> I've seen Jonathan Weiss submitted a better port in ports/76249 so I'd
> rather see his version comitted.
> 
> Cheers,


I second this. I would love to see ports/76249 commited.

Cheers,
Jonathan