From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 23:19:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C0E16A418 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outN.internet-mail-service.net (outN.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7994713C45D for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:19:23 -0800 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7A3126C90; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:19:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47606C79.5050009@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:19:21 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Silbersack References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:19:24 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support.. >> the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited >> functionality. >> It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs >> (I hope). >> Later there will be a more flexible version for-current. >> >> Here's the question.. >> >> I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. >> e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set >> xxx to 1 >> (0 based).. > > In the spirit of your subject, why not call them 'sheds'? > > -Mike I can see that taking some explaining... confused newbie: "Sheds?? why did they call them sheds?" old hand: "Well Grasshopper, Once there was this Danish guy who ...." [ten minutes later] confused newbie:" HUH? "