From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 19 11:00:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71808824 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44647132A for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0JB015f046951 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s0JB01l3046950; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201401191100.s0JB01l3046950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Anton Sayetsky Subject: Re: kern/134491: [zfs] Hot spares are rather cold... X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Anton Sayetsky List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:00:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/134491; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Anton Sayetsky To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, michel.bouissou@bioclinica.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/134491: [zfs] Hot spares are rather cold... Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:52:03 +0200 What is the purpose of ZFS spares on FreeBSD if they doesn't work at all? I cannot see any sense to use spare - I can just run "replace" subcommand, right?