From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 08:52:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5EE106564A for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086B88FC1B for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D13613DF5F; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:52:11 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:52:08 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <165642603.20110112115208@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Bernd Walter In-Reply-To: <20110111220314.GZ39356@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111163825.GF7511@numachi.com> <76226157.20110111222913@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4D2CB1F5.6080106@aws-net.org.ua> <98602823.20110111225049@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111220314.GZ39356@cicely7.cicely.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Artyom Viklenko , ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:52:13 -0000 Hello, Bernd. You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 1:03:14: > I'm not surprised that it doesn't work with autonegotian if autonegotian > is disabled. > If Linux does full-duplex without autonegotiation then _they_ do it wrong > and Hetzner shouldn't rely on wrong behavour. As far as I understand, Linux does full-duplex without autonegotiation because it is say to do full-duplex (like FreeBSD's "ifconfig re0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"). Is it violation of standard too -- manual configuration of FD? > However since you seem to have access it might be interesting to know the > exact network device and debug why hard setting is broken. As far as I understand, again, it is not broken, but disabled, because cause problems on some devices... --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov