Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:11:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1 Message-ID: <20120104141141.GA34976@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1325685490.99537.YahooMailClassic@web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <20120104110715.GB3811@FreeBSD.org> <1325685490.99537.YahooMailClassic@web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:58:10AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > --- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> ha scritto: > > How hard would it be to (re)implement missing features with > > emu10k1 and nuke GPL-polluted emu10kx? > > The emu10kx started from the emu10k1 and is mostly BSD licensed, > I did start cleaning it in kern/153901 but I didn't commit the > the emu10kx part. > > The only issue is getting rid of the remaining (small) > GPL'd headers. Alternatively this driver is already available > as a port (audio/emu10kx). Yes, I am aware of the port existence. My point was to leave just one, BSD licensed, full featured emu10k driver in the base (i.e. merge emu10k1 and emu10kx into one). Good to know that you're up to this; I hope we'll get there eventually. :-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120104141141.GA34976>