From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 11 12:15:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA23183 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:15:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA23178 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:15:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.31]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA18621 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:17:37 +0500 Message-ID: <369A5BF8.F18C9545@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:15:52 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Why so many ghostscript ports? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, My GNU ghostcript port was committed (thanks!), but I see in the web that we still have two older versions that IMHO should be nuked... cheers, Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message