From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 14:08:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA89916A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:08:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBD943D3F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:08:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j34E8bD8055423; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:08:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j34E8aL7055422; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:08:36 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050404140836.GB55311@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <1112618841.71324.23.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <1729.1112622423@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1729.1112622423@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Andrey Chernov cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't change partition table anymore X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:08:38 -0000 On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1112618841.71324.23.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>, Gavin Atkinson writes: > >On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 07:28 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> BTW, the trick with kern.geom.debugflags=16 works and I put it permanently > >> in my sysctl.conf. Could you please make it ON by default or make a > >> warning at least? > > > >I actually agree with this. It's so frustrating to not be able to do > >what you want to do as root. > > I tend to belive in sensible safety features. Forcing people who > do potentially dangerous acts to release the safety-catch mechanism > first doesn't strike me as a bad idea. > Unfortunately, the safety-catch *IS NOT* documented. If one only needs the sysctl once a year or so, it is a real PITA to find the right incantation. -- Steve