From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep 14 23:17:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA03583
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03578
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost)
	by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id CAA27502;
	Mon, 15 Sep 1997 02:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 02:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com>
To: Existence is Futile <nonxstnt@not.of.this.world.engelska.se>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why SPERL? 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970915062637.22299A-100000@krusty.the.clown.engelska.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970915021515.23909C-100000@echonyc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I was the one who asked this before, and the reason sperl4 is still
included is that the hole has been closed.

Just to make sure, I downloaded your exploit and ran it on my own machine.
It seg-faulted.  No root shell.



 Ben

"You have your mind on computers, it seems."