From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 10 17:28:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA25620 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:28:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-12.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA25614; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:28:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id RAA22400; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:27:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:27:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802110127.RAA22400@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com CC: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19980210213134.11817@klemm.gtn.com> (message from Andreas Klemm on Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:31:34 +0100) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/news/inn Makefile ports/news/inn/scripts configure From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * If I don't define NOTCL, then tcl80 will be build and installed * on -current ... And tcl sources of tcl80 are in the current source * tree ... How do you come to this assumption, that it's default * not to have tcl 80 on a ,normal' -current ??? Eww, please, not this again. It may be there, but ports are not allowed to use it. There are to be no discussions about this, we have gone through this many times already. I don't want to sound harsh, but we're all tired of this, let's just abide by the previous conclusion, ok? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message