From owner-freebsd-small Thu Jun 18 00:09:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA02776 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:09:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from luomat.peak.org (cc344191-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com [24.2.83.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02770 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:09:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luomat@luomat.peak.org) Received: by luomat.peak.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) id DAA07688 for freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 03:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199806180709.DAA07688@luomat.peak.org> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Timothy J Luoma Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 03:09:49 -0400 To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Q: Making a custom picoBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I will be doing a "real" installation of FreeBSD tomorrow (my first) via 2.2.5 CDs. I saw some docs somewhere for making my own picoBSD, which I will try to read tomorrow. I am just wondering, for a 486 which will be running as a router/firewall connected to an Ethernet connection (and eventually probably a PPP connection) would I be better off using -stable or -current or does it really matter? I was planning on using -stable as soon as I find out how to go from a 2.2.5 installation from CDs to -stable.... Thanks! TjL To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message