From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 1 03:51:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78831065674; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 03:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nakaji@kankyo-u.ac.jp) Received: from www.heimat.gr.jp (www.heimat.gr.jp [60.32.13.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD3D8FC15; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 03:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nakaji@kankyo-u.ac.jp) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heimat.gr.jp Received: from ra333.heimat.gr.jp.kankyo-u.ac.jp ([IPv6:2001:3e0:a84:0:200:4cff:fe17:573c]) by www.heimat.gr.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m213WIgA099426; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:32:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nakaji@kankyo-u.ac.jp) From: NAKAJI Hiroyuki To: yokota@res.otaru-uc.ac.jp References: <200802292316.m1TNGW5L098160@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:32:17 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200802292316.m1TNGW5L098160@freefall.freebsd.org> (linimon@freebsd.org's message of "Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:16:32 GMT") Message-ID: <864pbrnmpq.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=13.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on www.heimat.gr.jp Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/121221: [PATCH] www/plone3: fetch fails from behind a firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:51:22 -0000 >>>>> In <200802292316.m1TNGW5L098160@freefall.freebsd.org> >>>>> linimon@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > I cannot approve this patch. This is a launchpad.net's problem. > I understand your policy. However, I think there should be at least a > message to point out this problem. Wherever the problem should be > attributed, we have to use this problematic server anyway, and I don't > think it is a good idea to enforce social inefficiency that many users > waste time to identify the source of the problem. Right. I reported it to plone ML in Japan. http://ml.plone.jp/mailman/listinfo/plone-users Yokota-san, can you please write the message? I'm ready to approve. -- NAKAJI Hiroyuki