From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:32:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A494916A411 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E61743D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 97662 invoked by uid 0); 12 May 2006 10:33:38 -0300 Received: from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(201.17.165.158):. Processed in 2.373098 secs); 12 May 2006 13:33:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.69?) (201.17.165.158) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 12 May 2006 10:33:35 -0300 Message-ID: <44648E66.6010800@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:32:22 -0300 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051013 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vadim Goncharov References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:39 -0000 Vadim Goncharov wrote: > Hi, All! > > I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from: > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/ > > Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate > load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch > is small, so it simply can't be any bugs there ;)]. > > Personally I very like the idea from original Andrey's letter I have tested on 6.1 and works fine too. Hope it gets commited. Very useful for altq/dummynet flexibility too. -- Patrick Tracanelli