Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:32:35 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: want sudo but not sudo su - how Message-ID: <87hdtgpzak.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040612101402.GC72289@itconsultuk.net> (lists@itconsultuk.net's message of "Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:14:02 %2B0100") References: <20040612101402.GC72289@itconsultuk.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-06-12T10:14:02Z, John <lists@itconsultuk.net> writes: > Is there a way of enforcing this? No. For example, if you let them run vim as root, then they can open a shell from there and run commands in it. Either configure a list of commands that they can use safely, or set down a clear policy and enforce it. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAyyIT5sRg+Y0CpvERAh6cAJ9I00uEUi8UKpUcou7qH0Q4yqM6wACffnn6 H8TFDt1j7002rQXzwpaE9yU= =nxRH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87hdtgpzak.fsf>