Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:50:43 +0200 From: "Nicolas Cormier" <n.cormier@gmail.com> To: "John Polstra" <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: in-kernel tcp server Message-ID: <c4630b800706201350p176ddadcu6b4eb341751d94e7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46799032.5060009@polstra.com> References: <c4630b800706180227x2f1f433dr4ef55e8623062bf1@mail.gmail.com> <467787EF.9060009@elischer.org> <46797825.10900@polstra.com> <c4630b800706201239jdf09685t1574e78493492029@mail.gmail.com> <46799032.5060009@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/20/07, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> wrote: > Using ng_ksocket is almost the same as using the so* functions, since > the ksocket methods call the so* functions. But by using netgraph, you > get a nice management interface, too. > > For my application, I found that going through the socket layer (the so* > functions and/or ng_ksocket) hurt performance too much. That's why I > ended up bypassing them. Thanks for this precision. -- Nicolas Cormier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c4630b800706201350p176ddadcu6b4eb341751d94e7>