From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 19:50:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id E47A11065676; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:50:21 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Rene Ladan Message-ID: <20100808195021.GC26232@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008081759.o78Hxath039177@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100808193035.GB26232@FreeBSD.org> <4C5F0768.10004@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5F0768.10004@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Thomas Abthorpe , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Tobias Rehbein , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile patch-rltiles__Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:50:22 -0000 On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:37:12PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > On 08-08-2010 21:30, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:59:36PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > >>rene 2010-08-08 17:59:36 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > >> games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile > >> Added files: > >> games/stonesoup/files patch-rltiles__Makefile > >> Log: > >> - Update to 0.7.1 > >> - Split off SDL version into games/stonesoup-sdl slave port > >> - Note the new WWW site in pkg-descr > > > >What was wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS? PR does not give > >sufficient details. > > > >We generally try to avoid creating slaves unless fairly strong reason > >exist. Lots of ports optionally support SDL, imagine the numbers if we > >factored it all out in to slaves. > > > Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I > merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert > factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit. I will try, but this is not how it normally works: we do not blindly commit one's submissions. Submitter may be not aware about all possible implications their diff has; it is the committer's responsibility to make sure every part of proposed diff has it merits. Saying "I merely followed the PR" is definitely not enough. ./danfe