From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 19 06:01:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA216A41A for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com (omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.93.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F9D13C458 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from oaamta02sl.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.162.95]) by omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070819060150.JNWD4018.omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta02sl.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:01:50 +0000 Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([124.188.162.95]) by oaamta02sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070819060150.SYSS2725.oaamta02sl.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:01:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 56521 invoked by uid 501); 19 Aug 2007 06:01:39 -0000 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:01:39 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Randy Bush Message-ID: <20070819060139.GA40369@duncan.reilly.home> References: <20070815122747.GA62123@duncan.reilly.home> <18117.37649.6266.369458@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <18119.3872.547510.973785@roam.psg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18119.3872.547510.973785@roam.psg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:01:56 -0000 On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 05:24:16AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > i just upgraded two RELENG_6 boxes to 7-CURRENT last eve. no prob. > i was silly and broke the union rules by following the instructions > at the bottom of /usr/src/UPDATING. it is extremely rare that i > have had problems on this path, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7. have not > tried 7 to 8 yet. Thanks for the "it works" reports, folks. Re-supped and currently re-building, and it seems to be going OK now. Yes, I've upgraded in-place on most previous occasions, too. (Only exception was to 6, from memory, because a dump/wipe/install/restore seemed to be the easiest way to get UFS2 onto the disks...) Oh: there's an 8? I didn't think that 7 had been tagged/branched, yet. Cheers, -- Andrew