From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Aug 26 04:31:21 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA13445
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:31:21 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA13439
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:31:19 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA28774; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:31:13 -0700
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: `make info'? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Aug 1995 03:32:29 PDT."
             <199508261032.DAA01272@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:31:13 -0700
Message-ID: <28772.809436673@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think this is a good idea.  Actually, for the top level and one
> level below it, I think we can just have it "cat README".... :)

Yes!  Yes!

> Speaking of the toplevel, may I delete GUIDELINES?  It is obsolete, I
> have no intentions (nor the time) to update it, people should refer to 
> the handbook anyway....

Assuming that we replace it with a system like this, I have no
objection.

						Jordan