From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 15:56:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF78616A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:56:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB4043D58 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:56:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 2504 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2003 23:56:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 20 Dec 2003 23:56:10 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:57:10 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Bob Perry Message-Id: <20031221015710.12c81d29.itetcu@apropo.ro> In-Reply-To: <3FE4DC12.1000302@earthlink.net> References: <3FE4DC12.1000302@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: [Fwd: Portupgrade Stale Dependency Issue] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:56:17 -0000 On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:32:34 -0500 Bob Perry wrote: > Just ran pkgdb -F per prompt from the portversion program and got the > following > two messages: > > Stale origin: 'textproc/ruby-rdoc': perhaps moved or obsoleted. > -> The port 'textproc/ruby-rdoc' was removed on 2003-12-15 because: > "integrated into ruby18 and ruby16-shim-ruby18" > -> Hint: ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 is not required by any other package > -> Hint: checking for overwritten files... > -> No files installed by ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 have been overwritten by > other packages. > Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [no] > > Appears as though I'm being told that ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 can be removed, > yet the > default selection re deinstall is "no". Am I missing something? As the hint says, you can deintsall it. After you're done with pkgdf -F do a portupgrade -r on ruby18 or ruby16-shim-ruby18, which ever you have. > Second: > Stale dependency: gnome2-2.4.1 -> openldap-client-2.1.23 > (net/openldap21-client): > openldap-client-2.0.27 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] It seems that you had down-graded your open-ldap. You now have installed openladap 2.0.27 on you system, but when you've installed gmnome you had 2.1.13; you can either choose: a) yes (or all) and doing so will "point" gnome (or all) "to depend" on openldap-client-2.0.27 or b) no, terminate pkgbd and do a portupgrade on openldap-client to bring it back to 2.1.xx Choose what you need (if you have something that requires 2.0 do a if not do b.) > I click the default selection "no" and I'm prompted to input a new > dependency. > Assuming that I need to install openldap-client-2.1.23, I review the > net/openldap21-client port directory and I only find a Makefile. And ? That make file sets CLIENT_ONLY=yes and includes the ../openldap21-server's Makefile so all is OK. Looking at the places where CLINET_ONLY appears in the Make file tells that You can define to have or not the docs installed and to have WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) SASL2 support. > If someone can explain what the program is asking, I may be in a > better position to respond appropriately. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user