From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 05:24:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0D7106566B; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401038FC08; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so7675376qyk.13 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7y2M89UAt/+KN4BggQPgrd4tctiY9Y4B6pUkbWjrp/0=; b=SyrJj2b5D+KPIL2Svl/Hh857eClznUSRRM7itw5SHs86vZtRLs9uE7m7iuQwa1Sp/L rj1pnsHe/d2tZVOQb537SYvrxGG3QVGLcvkgzlCKRH2cH2RE5649WZi1NKL++PDy2fgO fozoyZJDuLTAYB3xNfIBGPYHZQRQJF1GwmgqU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.183.205 with SMTP id ch13mr1539178qab.274.1317101069187; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.74.82 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:24:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:24:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:24:30 -0000 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks >> were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come >> sooner than it actually did. > > First, I'm not complaining or criticizing any of the developers and I > am very grateful to > aDe for maintaining them as I get a headache every time I start looking at them. > > I am baffled in my attempts to parse "didn't consider that the future > would come sooner > than it actually did". Is that what you really meant, because it's > self-contradictory? Or > am I just confused. It just means that folks didn't plan ahead and didn't think up proper contingency plans. FWIW FreeBSD has developed faster in the last couple of years than most folks would have expected -- including myself -- and the release cycles reflect that change. That's more of what I was addressing in my previous reply. Corner cases are the bane of all software developers. -Garrett