From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 16 13:38:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.dellroad.org (adsl-63-194-81-26.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.81.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAF237B698; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from curve.dellroad.org (curve.dellroad.org [10.1.1.30]) by InterJet.dellroad.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20825; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from archie@localhost) by curve.dellroad.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA10547; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200101162138.NAA10547@curve.dellroad.org> Subject: Re: HEADSUP! New netgraph code coming In-Reply-To: "from Dag-Erling Smorgrav at Jan 16, 2001 07:23:18 pm" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) Cc: Archie Cobbs , Julian Elischer , Jun Kuriyama , net@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL77 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > At some point in the past, MODULE_VERSION wasn't required. Whoever > > committed the checkin that made suddenly made MODULE_VERSION required > > should have added it to all affected files, or at least there should > > have been a HEADS UP, but I don't recall seeing one. > > If I recall correctly, it was Mike, and the commit message was fairly > explicit. It seems like fairly explicit commit message wasn't sufficient then. Whatever.. developers should pay more attention and committers should be more explicit. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message