From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 25 04:06:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E639AED; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@felyko.com) Received: from felyko.com (felyko.com [174.136.100.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8398B2B39; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:119:15a2:4ee8:1063:6b03] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:119:15a2:4ee8:1063:6b03]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by felyko.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F3013982B; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=felyko.com; s=mail; t=1374725181; bh=mYQOBGfQ7hH27v3qG5P0LCn+MzlTYKKpEZOwVBNiGnE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=BeytxFGJq6EBtOrEogzwrn6N6I9Rd/bhU5727xW/Y2BkP/zT5+Dwzt/DnQnHDJl9n KeE2NwUc0W3rfpv36iCYvh0/2AUne85vAMby8Yfyd0WTunsFEqj5gdysI0rXv8vFTa TAS+UuVJrDPKT1bJ9f/mOtm/4u5JgMxj5qXTMbv8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Adding options to RPI-B From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <25D75461-E6FB-43C3-86AE-A513B02FA00D@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:06:20 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org> <42C259D6-F652-417A-80B5-536893D6D642@felyko.com> <25D75461-E6FB-43C3-86AE-A513B02FA00D@freebsd.org> To: Tim Kientzle X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:06:27 -0000 On 24 Jul 2013, at 20:56, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On Jul 24, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Rui Paulo wrote: >=20 >> On 24 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>=20 >>> On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>=20 >>>> .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping >>>> stripped down kernels w/ modules. >>>=20 >>> I've used modules; as far as I can tell, they work just fine. >>> The status quo is historical legacy. >>>=20 >>>> We have loader support for arm, right? :) >>>=20 >>> Would someone please commit the change to the >>> RPi kernel config to enable all modules by default? >>>=20 >>> That will let us verify the current status before we start >>> removing things that are currently static. >>=20 >>=20 >> Done, r253634. >=20 >=20 > Rui: >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Hiren and others: >=20 > Please try experimenting with modules on RPi and > BeagleBone and let folks here know what works and > doesn't work. You should be able to: > * Load modules manually > * Load them from loader.conf No, I don't think loader.conf is supported on ARM. We need to fix that, = but until then modules have to be loaded from loader.rc. :-( -- Rui Paulo