From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 18 14:40:18 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 14:40:15 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7784F37B400 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A920C3E59; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:40:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:40:14 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: Ray Qiu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPoE program Message-ID: <20001218234014.A57735@skriver.dk> References: <20001218223359.53848.qmail@web9106.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001218223359.53848.qmail@web9106.mail.yahoo.com>; from ray_qiu@yahoo.com on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:33:59PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:33:59PM -0800, Ray Qiu wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > I am not using DSL. It is the apartment network. > > But I think the PPPoE is based on bridged ethernet > packets. If they are using hubs instead of switches > as the access points, then I am probably sharing the > same broadcast domain with other users. They probably > will not change this for me. It doesn't fix the problem in the code, but it's ugly, but your probably right about them going to "fix" it ... Sorry for my interrupting ... /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message