Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:35:21 -0400
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Benjamin Adams <adams.benjamin@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: IBM T60 dmsg 6.1-RC1 (problems will test patches)
Message-ID:  <200604201135.22708.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200604200816.49570.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <1145467346.32933.8.camel@BrutusBSD.rochester.rr.com> <200604191619.25287.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200604200816.49570.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 20 April 2006 08:16 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 04:19 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 03:28 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > RELENG_6 does not *display* number of cores but -CURRENT
> > > should:
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/amd64/amd64/ident
> > >cpu. c.diff?r1=1.136&r2=1.140
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/i386/i386/identcp
> > >u.c. diff?r1=1.150&r2=1.145
> > >
> > > One thing that I neglected to MFC... :-(
> >
> > Here is patch for RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_1 for multicore
> > detection:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/multicore-RELENG_6.diff
>
> This is a good start, but we still need to update the CPU masks
> in mp_machdep.c for stuff like the 'hyperthreading_allowed' sysctl
> to actually work correctly.  This should probably be MFC'd first
> though and the CPU masks fixed in HEAD.

I agree.  I will commit this as soon as code freeze is over.

Jung-uk Kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604201135.22708.jkim>