From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 2 20:59:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B74F37B479 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:59:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eA34xiL09053; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:59:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:59:43 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "David J. Kanter" Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: CVSup or CVS? Message-ID: <20001102205943.G20567@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001102201349.A45920@freebsd.mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20001102201349.A45920@freebsd.mindspring.com>; from david.kanter@mindspring.com on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 08:13:49PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * David J. Kanter [001102 18:14] wrote: > For a DSL connection, is CVSup preferred to CVS? I've used CVS in the past > because it's a part of the base system, so I didn't have to install anything > extraneous. But is CVSup considered "better"? CVSup is considerably easier on bandwidth and disk access. > And, if I use CVSup with a 1.5Mbps DSL connection, should I comment out the > *default compress line? That's what's suggested. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message