From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 15:22:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEDC106566C for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0718cc3a79=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976A58FC13 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37991 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 14:56:15 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Apr 2010 14:56:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1004; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=uPVVfbvY6HtrcwSHnufiTL+gcDQGjP1BXitsUkvtRl4=; b=b525pxCAzmQCjzoYHhwKJRCTUnReg9N0DYenyEn5EQ0lD9SIfgIF2dVCYfQv5KU0RV7VfpqC+Gndq55mW1F/aAkgM4EH+LDdJ1/KjumXAqdudhq/zIzyOdBppQxo2hRFB84Ya3ylMEwV3oMB3e1xh7xRZGydUnvm5tJ87x5SJPg= Date: 19 Apr 2010 14:56:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20100419145615.48204.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: kraduk@googlemail.com Subject: Re: DJB and root ns server dnssec signing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:22:58 -0000 I also use djbdns and don't expect any particular problems, since you don't get EDNS responses if you don't make EDNS queries. There's a one-line patch I can probably dig up which makes dnscache accept oversized responses. Dunno if it would help, but it's unlikely to hurt. R's, John