Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:05:47 +0200 From: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r412296 - head/lang/rust Message-ID: <CAFU734xGcOuzH%2BbSNMZw6M8a5GYZkdSD11L8-h_T9W2zge18jg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C4C464C799DD4405CCC76990@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201603312004.u2VK4n5n028013@repo.freebsd.org> <CAFU734wN13GQnHuXHQ_sW97v9%2Bq3TSYyZPHiqLTjq5HYwO=SAQ@mail.gmail.com> <C4C464C799DD4405CCC76990@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 April 2016 at 11:45, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > It is documented in the porter's handbook, where it all belongs: > <https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html>; > > And, it is covered by the "Trivial and tested build and runtime fixes." > bullet point. Thanks for stepping in, but I am a 100% sure that this statement will not put the case to rest. Based on this statement: - John will maintain his position that this commit was trivial, tested and fixes a problem *on DragonFly* and hence *is* covered by the blanket - I will maintain my position that this commit does *not* fix a problem *on FreeBSD* and hence is *not* covered by the blanket I am totally fine accepting any verdict from portmgr, but I want it to be inescapably clear. Please review the commit and let us know once and for all: Is this particular one covered by the blanket or not? Thank you Riggs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFU734xGcOuzH%2BbSNMZw6M8a5GYZkdSD11L8-h_T9W2zge18jg>