From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri May 15 23:20:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D8D2DD449 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P4C96njqz4bxn; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CDD113E42; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 23:20:36 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , Kyle Evans , Poul-Henning Kamp , Alan Somers , Arne Steinkamm Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Disallowing read() of a directory fd Message-ID: <20200515232035.GC516@lonesome.com> References: <202005152306.04FN6Irf049862@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202005152306.04FN6Irf049862@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P4C96njqz4bxn X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of linimon@lonesome.com has no SPF policy when checking 18.222.6.11) smtp.mailfrom=linimon@lonesome.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.868,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.15)[ip: (0.04), ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.21), asn: 16509(-0.94), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.43)[-0.434,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 May 2020 07:56:00 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 23:20:38 -0000 On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > From: John Baldwin > > I've watched many threads involving you over the past several years, > > Flame bait declined. I am going to side with jhb here. Your commonly-relied-upon tactic of "making demands" has become utterly tiresome. Not only are you yourself, as an individual contributor, in no position to make demands: making demands has no place in a cooperative volunteer project such as this, whatsoever. If that was the way things worked in the old days, well, then that was a Bug, not a Feature. I personally gave up attempting to work with you years ago. I only type these keystrokes in the hope that *something* might change. I offer this *regardless* of whether I agree with what you said, or not. mcl