From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 13:57:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B801065683; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128538FC2C; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2008 09:57:05 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id KBR70655; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:57:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2008 09:57:01 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18540.55980.938489.721330@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:57:00 -0400 To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <486CD2E8.50505@FreeBSD.org> References: <20080702232551.GA3204@pcjas.obspm.fr> <486CD2E8.50505@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr, FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Idea for next portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:57:06 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk writes: > > If portupgrade can calculate the depency and launch many ports > > build in same time for non-depending ports it's can be > > wonderful. > > I'm sure it's a good idea. I'd use it too. But I have a very > little free time with my current employment. So I can't implement > it. Sorry. It is also my understanding that ruby (used to manage the ports database) a) is not re-entrant and/or b) does not lock the files it is using/changing. Having two instances running at once causes Bad Things(tm) to happen. Robert Huff