From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 19 01:59:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62854C1C for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301E62A5C for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAJ1xENH011957 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:59:14 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAJ1xEhU011956 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:59:14 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 29983 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2013 19:59:12 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 18 Nov 2013 19:59:12 -0600 Message-ID: <528AC5ED.1090402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:59:09 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koichiro IWAO , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: single PR vs multiple PR References: <59985f9fec5e0c1741281f6a49342a38@vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <59985f9fec5e0c1741281f6a49342a38@vmeta.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W4vOgHJxaqbqkSfcSkbEwMuKREKWSwpOJ" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:59:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --W4vOgHJxaqbqkSfcSkbEwMuKREKWSwpOJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/17/2013 11:46 PM, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > When maintainer-updating ports, generally, I think one port per one PR > is a good manner. Do committers mind if I made a single PR such a case= > applying quite similar changes to multiple port? Which do comitters pre= fer? >=20 > For example: > https://redports.org/changeset?reponame=3D&new=3D19778%40meta%2Fnet&old= =3D19668%40meta%2Fnet >=20 >=20 > Thanks, If it's for your ports 1 PR is fine if you want. If it's for other people's ports, it's often much simpler to have multiple PR as each maintainer will get notified individually automatically. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --W4vOgHJxaqbqkSfcSkbEwMuKREKWSwpOJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSisXtAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPNqoH/0gR1EY/Q3Mh5MeXxnatSrw5 BhXqRNy4OEBPXgbk4TnotUO/vVvP8lefkP+37AsylvWeCl8h1+iLIb/dcEmWf6qX or8z81quRPWAfQ9Z4PmgDvxqEVbYM69xI0lWJa7p9jmkT0u2n4K/mPudGWS3wmI+ MUR+IRLsn1S++CKt78inBZFKPLd8vGT1RuxkJ169YVEIBuRxC1ZHbSE2D1/whfr4 M974jCNcMaF003rA8gGNe49tH3c1MYVBovLxUbpR9kgTm/PhJjvwceLtIqs5E1X7 Uo7hnix8tNy3uDRCRWtU9ApR3tE1FWFzSIO1FNXsNgx8xJy0LSoIXYoER0UyAbU= =rOVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W4vOgHJxaqbqkSfcSkbEwMuKREKWSwpOJ--