Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:25:31 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange outcome: different outcomes from portmaster and pkg upgrade Message-ID: <a2003dd6-612c-ccd9-5e5a-a14bd6af0305@tx.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20200305122407.4198b191@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <4418f3c1-e025-e691-5c98-9ab9dd32ccc9@tx.rr.com> <20200305122407.4198b191@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/5/20 6:24 AM, RW via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:09:41 -0600 > Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> I normally build my ports using portmaster. ( Old habits die hard.) >> >> Recently, I've been having problems with a handful of ports failing >> to upgrade. So, I've been fixing those ports by using pkg upgrade. >> >> When I run portmaster, it says I have three ports to upgrade. When I >> run pkg upgrade, it says everything is up to date. > Presumably your packages are up to date with the repository, but not > the ports tree. The ports tree is updated daily through a script in /etc/periodic/daily. [root@colo11 /usr/home/schmehl]# cat /etc/periodic/daily/190.portsnap #!/bin/sh /usr/sbin/portsnap cron /usr/sbin/portsnap update I just ran it manually, but it didn't update any of the affected ports. # portsnap update Removing old files and directories... done. Extracting new files: /usr/ports/astro/xearth/ /usr/ports/audio/libebur128/ /usr/ports/devel/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/py-cle/ /usr/ports/devel/py-minidump/ /usr/ports/devel/py-rq/ /usr/ports/dns/knot2/ /usr/ports/emulators/nemu/ /usr/ports/graphics/pastel/ /usr/ports/graphics/tiled/ /usr/ports/lang/erlang-runtime21/ /usr/ports/mail/ssmtp/ /usr/ports/math/acalc/ /usr/ports/net-mgmt/cacti-spine/ /usr/ports/net-mgmt/ping_exporter/ /usr/ports/net/py-cloudscraper/ /usr/ports/net/storj/ /usr/ports/sysutils/dua-cli/ /usr/ports/www/riot-web/ /usr/ports/x11/libwacom/ /usr/ports/x11/sddm/ Building new INDEX files... done. But portmaster still finds ports it wants to update: ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade cups-2.2.12 to cups-2.2.13 Upgrade gnutls-3.6.11.1 to gnutls-3.6.12 Upgrade ffmpeg-4.2.1_4,1 to ffmpeg-4.2.2_7,1 ===>>> Proceed? y/n [y] n And pkg does not. # pkg upgrade gnutls Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. Except for ffmpeg. # pkg upgrade ffmpeg Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. The following 4 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: aom: 1.0.0.2873 dav1d: 0.5.2_1 opus: 1.3.1 Installed packages to be UPGRADED: ffmpeg: 4.2.1_4,1 -> 4.2.2,1 Number of packages to be installed: 3 Number of packages to be upgraded: 1 The process will require 10 MiB more space. 18 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: -- Paul Schmehl, Retired My opinions are my own. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2003dd6-612c-ccd9-5e5a-a14bd6af0305>