From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 20 13:47:36 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228841065673
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8308FC2A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:47:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82AE9CB0CF;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz
Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 5I2L6jgVv-ao; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DFB9CB0F0;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rdivacky@localhost)
	by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3KDj681066173;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:06 +0200
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de>
Message-ID: <20100420134506.GA65857@freebsd.org>
References: <x2za0777e081004200039z69fb39f8rb598e296d74ab8e3@mail.gmail.com>
	<permail-2010042012380180e26a0b000007de-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <permail-2010042012380180e26a0b000007de-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:47:36 -0000

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> Eitan Adler schrieb am 2010-04-20:
> > > i was also wondering: what's the reason gcc is still being used
> > > during step
> > > "Building an up-to-date make(1)" and not clang?
> 
> > because make segfaults when using clang ;)
> 
> ah ok. that's quite a good reason. ;)

no, the gcc is used because you have CC=cc in your /usr/share/mk/sys.mk
you can setenv CC clang to get rid of this (and yes, it WILL work)

I have identified the problem with make (and all other statically linked
apps) and I even have a possible fix for that.

expect this to be fixed soon