From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 6 8:19:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2C437B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from glamredhel.hayholt.org (hayholt.org [195.18.109.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B87C43F93 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@hayholt.org) Received: from eldar.hayholt.org (unknown [192.168.0.2]) by glamredhel.hayholt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85DFAF11; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:19:25 +0000 (WET) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:19:42 +0100 (CET) From: Marcel Stangenberger To: Bill Moran Cc: Philip Hallstrom , "" Subject: Re: building a VPN with FreeBSD 4.7p3 In-Reply-To: <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: <20030206171903.U17367@eldar.hayholt.org> References: <20030204080406.Q23132-100000@cypress.adhesivemedia.com> <20030204214707.X52428@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E40466E.3000906@potentialtech.com> <20030205125500.A53666@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E414446.3060500@potentialtech.com> <20030205192845.W565@eldar.hayholt.org> <3E415935.6030207@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Well, nat is definately not a requirement for a vtun, it's just that it's > such a common scenerio that it gets lots of howtos written about it. > > And I would bet that (if you're using RFC-1918 addys as you say) that you > really _are_ using nat. It's just not FreeBSD that's doing it, it's probably > the router in your diagram that has built-in nat capabilities. > wooooowie!! i got it running, now tune-ing it :-) Thanks for the help Marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message