From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 17:00:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076AE16A400 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E81243D5F for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2HH0fIq002656 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:41 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2HH0fpd002655; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:41 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:41 GMT Message-Id: <200603171700.k2HH0fpd002655@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Vitaly Bogdanov Cc: Subject: Re: docs/74477: [patch] Correct several links in the contributing article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vitaly Bogdanov List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:42 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/74477; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vitaly Bogdanov To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/74477: [patch] Correct several links in the contributing article Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:49:03 +0400 >...... >...... >> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ >> > >> > Get copies of formal standards like &posix;. You can >> > get some links about these standards at the > > - url=3D"&url.base;/projects/c99/index.html">FreeBSD >> > + >> > url=3D"http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/c99/index.html">FreeBSD >> > C99 & POSIX Standards Conformance Project web >> > site. Compare FreeBSD's behavior to that required by the >> > standard. If the behavior differs, particularly in subtle >> >> Hmm. This is not right. There should be a better way to specify >> that a >> url is part of the web build and will not be present locally when >> the >> docs are built. Perhaps we can make URLS_ABSOLUTE= yes the default >> and >> override it during a web build? > >Yes, I agree, there should be a better way to achieve this. My patch >does not correct the real problem, it only avoids it. I dissagre. Why should something strange and difficult be invented? As I can understand, there are no advantages in using `'&url.base;/.....`' for www/ content. Simple using absolute dns names everywhere in references to web-site content (not doc/ tree) seems to be more superior and easy solution. -- Vitaly