From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 07:54:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C1216A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristiano.deana@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7C43D46 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristiano.deana@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so32003wra for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:54:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ncloVMWxahmYZVXcUy20kyg5KNKlsdsI16l2sKZWtTkKlnOgunx5ADmekSzC6GDFf9+YdhRdrnvVqBNVTZHPLNjkssld33DyGwULAOZSX1BcSLY6AU+JxXziCh9WeAaQuSSh9VYiKvEPOg8Rqsktemp8QgvGMfVIoXU0LmJHrnI= Received: by 10.54.112.11 with SMTP id k11mr1894898wrc; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.114.5 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:54:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:54:10 +0100 From: Cristiano Deana To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <4366C1BB.8080202@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051031082807.GA68204@xor.obsecurity.org> <4366ACF0.20606@box559.com> <4366C1BB.8080202@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:54:11 -0000 2005/11/1, Scott Long : > The future direction is that FreeBSD will continue to be friendly to > novice users while still affording power users the control that they > seek. Scott, that's right. but: we can have our personal way to shoot in the foot, we can use big, BIG, advice "dont remove this line!" in our kernel, we can have our DEAFULTS file. No difference what we/you choose, but a little explanation for any of us about changes I thing should be in GENERIC or in DEFAULTS (better in UPDATING). Thank to you and all re@ people for this great 6.0. Good job. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/